Interesting interactive graphic here on the topography of Faith in America
From a pew forum study
Americans could only answer correctly 50% of the questions on a very simple religious knowledge survey. Three main areas on the survey: knowledge of the Bible, knowledge of other religions and knowledge about role of religion in public life of America. Interesting stats
- Athiests/agnostics, mormons and those of the Jewish faith have a higher level of overall religious knowledge than do protestants
- Mormons and white evangelical protestants know more about Christianity than do other groups
- Jews and athiests/agnostics have a higher level of knowledge about other faiths and about religion in public life than do other groups
Interesting paragraph on bible reading
- Many Americans are devoted readers of Scripture: More than a third (37%) say they read the Bible or other Holy Scriptures at least once a week, not counting worship services. But Americans as a whole are much less inclined to read other books about religion. Nearly half of Americans who are affiliated with a religion (48%) say they “seldom” or “never” read books (other than Scripture) or visit websites about their own religion, and 70% say they seldom or never read books or visit websites about other religions.
Click here If you want to take a quiz representing an abbreviated form of the questions asked. I scored 87%, missed a question on public prayer being allowed in America and one other.
Fascinating study of the early Jewish sources by Dr. Gerald Schroeder about the age of the earth. He suggests that we are dealing with two ages in Genesis 1. The first six days are billions of years (don’t quite track how he computes the length of time) but suggests that it has only been a little less than 6000 years from the creation of Adam on day 7. I am impressed but I suspect the young earthers out there will not be!
Saw this in a comment on the GetReligion.org site
After reading an article on Nidal Hasan, I was struck by the question about how difficult it is many to distinguish between piety and fanaticism. That got me going on a parallel track. The author of the above article was actually commenting on an earlier article published in the Washington Post and asked the following:
In other words: when does piety become deadly? The question is not only how do you draw the line, but where? Daily prayer? Making a pilgrimage Mecca? Traveling to Pakistan for terror training?
Further, there is a serious societal danger in misreading piety for fanaticism.
Looking up pious on Wikipedia, I found the following: “While different people may understand its meaning differently, it is generally used to refer either to religious devotion or to spirituality, or often, a combination of both. A common element in most conceptions of piety is humility.”
Spirituality is one of those words that is often used today but seldom understood and has as many definitions as there are writers. The word “spirituality” is not used in the Bible but there is “spiritual” or pneumatikos (greek). Pneumatikos is used 21 times in the NT, 20 of these by Paul and 11 of them in 1 Corinthians. It seems that the opposite of spiritual is unspiritual or fleshly (sarkinos) which is also translated as worldly in the NIV. Spiritual individuals are also contrasted with the immature or nerios in 1 Cor 3:1) Spiritual teaching is contrasted with human wisdom or sophia (1 cor 2:13). Something is spiritual because of the work of the Holy Spirit (pneuma) and so we have spiritual gifts (1 Cor 12:1, 14:1), spiritual people (Gal 6:1) spiritual blessings (Eph 1:3), spiritual songs (Eph 5:19) , spiritual wisdom and understanding (Col 1:9) and a spiritual house (1 Pet 2:5). The one exception is in Eph 6:12 in which “the spiritual forces of evil” are referred and there spiritual seems to contrast with the fleshly or bodily forces of evil. One could also look at Gal 5:22-23 to see what the fruit of the Spirit should be.
Now it gets very interesting when one considers religion or threskeia in the NT which is only used in three passages. In Col 2:18 threskeia is used to describe the worship of angels. And what does Paul equate with this religion? False humility, an unspiritual mind that is “puffed up with idle notions,” someone who has “lost connection with the Head” (referring to Christ), “based on human commands and teaching,” have an appearance of wisdom, self-imposed worship, false humility, a “harsh treatment of the body” that “lacks any value in restraining sensual indulgence.” Sounds like fanaticism to me.
When you look at threskeia in James 1:26, 27, we learn that true religion (spirituality?), religion that God accepts as “pure and faultless”, means that we can “control our tongue,” that “we take care of orphans and widows in their distress” and involves keeping ourselves from “being polluted by the world.” If we don’t do these things, then we are “deceived” and our “religion is worthless.”
I find this to be quite convicting personally and would welcome comments.
Here is a summary of Pew Research study on Islamic populations in the world. One section,
More than 60 per cent of Muslims are in Asia, with only 20 per cent in the Middle East and North Africa. But the latter have the highest percentages of Muslim-majority countries, some of them with Islamic populations of 95 per cent or more.
Just to be fair, here is a link to Greg Laden’s post about how missionaries in Africa have set back the gay rights of Africans. Of course, he only presents part of the story. Would be interesting to find out the laws against child abuse and attempted murder. If people are intentionally infecting others with HIV, would that not be the same as poisoning them although with a much higher assurance of success?